Diamonds have a hardness comparable to diamonds, but they are not diamonds. It is precisely because of this characteristic that people like to use them instead of love, symbolizing the longevity of love. However, due to the difficulty in obtaining diamonds and the issue of price, we are currently researching an artificial synthetic diamond, which can also be used to make diamond rings. Let's take a look at how this type of diamond works together with the editor of Xi'an Juxue.com.

In 2016, various media outlets rushed to report on laboratory cultivation of diamonds. Almost all news reports recognize the undeniable fact that diamonds, whether grown in laboratories or naturally mined, have exactly the same essence.

Charles Choi, a journalist for the American monthly magazine "The New Era of Technology," proposed to his girlfriend (now fianc é e) holding a laboratory grown diamond. In addition, Racked journalist Chavie Lieber cited Ariel Baruch, who has been in the jewelry business for three generations, as saying in her article, "There are two types of diamonds in the world. The first diamond comes from a clean and flawless laboratory, and the other diamond is mined by miners who put in a lot of effort from a harsh mining environment."

What is the clarity of diamonds

Clarity classification refers to the relative degree of the internal and external cleanliness characteristics of a diamond, which is artificially divided into a series of high and low levels.

The cleanliness classification uses a 10x magnifying glass to classify the internal and external features of diamonds. At the beginning of the 20th century, Paris, an important diamond trading center at that time, began to observe the flaws of diamonds from a trade perspective and divided them into two categories based on their quality:

1. A "clean" diamond with no visible flaws;

2. More common "defective" diamonds with obvious flaws. This is the prototype of cleanliness classification.

Formation of Diamond Clarity Standards

In the mid-20th century, the Gemological Institute (GIA) in the United States proposed a systematic cleanliness classification scheme based on the number, size, quantity, location, and type of defects observed, using a 10x magnifying glass as a benchmark, and defined the cleanliness term in detail. This grading scheme has been widely recognized and adopted by the industry since its proposal. In the late 1960s, various diamond grading systems were introduced in Europe, and the neutral word inclusions replaced the derogatory term Imperfect in GIA, which was later accepted by GIA. However, diamonds not only have internal defects, but also surface defects, so internal features become synonymous with inclusions, and the corresponding terms for external features naturally arise.